Skip to content
homeaboutworkprojectsthesiswritingresume
Loading
~/blog/measures-and-integration0%dark
  1. home/
  2. writing/
  3. Measures and Integration

03 June 2026 · 7 min read · updated 09 June 2026

Measures and Integration

We fix the language of measure spaces and measurable functions, construct the Lebesgue integral by approximation from below, and prove the monotone convergence theorem. Fatou's lemma and the dominated convergence theorem follow as corollaries, and we close with the Holder and Minkowski inequalities and the completeness of L^p.

  • 4 equations
  • 11 results
  • 12 connections
  • measure-theory
  • real-analysis
  • integration
On this page▾
  • Measure spaces
  • The Lebesgue integral
  • The convergence theorems
  • The L^p inequalities
  • A limit that is not an integral

7 min left

  • Measure spaces1m
  • The Lebesgue integral1m
  • The convergence theorems2m
  • The L^p inequalities2m
  • A limit that is not an integral1m

Integration theory rests on a single move. One defines the integral of a nonnegative function as the supremum of the integrals of the simple functions beneath it, then proves that this construction commutes with monotone limits. The standard interchange theorems used in probability descend from that one theorem.

#Measure spaces

Definition1

A σ\sigmaσ-algebra on a set Ω\OmegaΩ is a collection F\mathcal FF of subsets containing Ω\OmegaΩ and closed under complementation and countable unions. A measure is a function μ:F→[0,∞]\mu:\mathcal F\to[0,\infty]μ:F→[0,∞] with μ(∅)=0\mu(\varnothing)=0μ(∅)=0 that is countably additive, so that for pairwise disjoint A1,A2,⋯∈FA_1,A_2,\dots\in\mathcal FA1​,A2​,⋯∈F,

μ ⁣(⋃nAn)=∑nμ(An).(1)\mu\!\Big(\bigcup_{n} A_n\Big)=\sum_{n}\mu(A_n). \tag{1}μ(n⋃​An​)=n∑​μ(An​).(1)

The triple (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu)(Ω,F,μ) is a measure space, and μ\muμ is a probability measure when μ(Ω)=1\mu(\Omega)=1μ(Ω)=1.

A function f:Ω→Rf:\Omega\to\Rf:Ω→R is measurable when f−1((a,∞))∈Ff^{-1}((a,\infty))\in\mathcal Ff−1((a,∞))∈F for every a∈Ra\in\Ra∈R, equivalently when preimages of Borel sets lie in F\mathcal FF. The same definition applies to [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞]-valued functions, with fff measurable when f−1((a,∞])∈Ff^{-1}((a,\infty])\in\mathcal Ff−1((a,∞])∈F for every a∈Ra\in\Ra∈R; the supremum integral below and the monotone limits we build are taken in this extended-real class. Measurable functions are closed under pointwise limits because {sup⁡nfn>a}=⋃n{fn>a}\{\sup_n f_n>a\}=\bigcup_n\{f_n>a\}{supn​fn​>a}=⋃n​{fn​>a} and {inf⁡nfn<a}=⋃n{fn<a}\{\inf_n f_n<a\}=\bigcup_n\{f_n<a\}{infn​fn​<a}=⋃n​{fn​<a} exhibit sup⁡\supsup, inf⁡\infinf, and hence lim sup⁡\limsuplimsup, lim inf⁡\liminfliminf, lim⁡\limlim as countable set operations. Closure under sums follows from {f+g>a}=⋃r∈Q({f>r}∩{g>a−r})\{f+g>a\}=\bigcup_{r\in\mathbb Q}(\{f>r\}\cap\{g>a-r\}){f+g>a}=⋃r∈Q​({f>r}∩{g>a−r}), a countable union of measurable sets, and closure under products from fg=12((f+g)2−f2−g2)fg=\tfrac12((f+g)^2-f^2-g^2)fg=21​((f+g)2−f2−g2) with x↦x2x\mapsto x^2x↦x2 continuous. Existence of nontrivial measures rests on the extension theorem below.

Theorem2

(Caratheodory extension.) A countably additive premeasure on an algebra of subsets of Ω\OmegaΩ extends to a measure on the generated σ\sigmaσ-algebra, and the extension is unique when the premeasure is σ\sigmaσ-finite. Lebesgue measure on R\RR is the extension of the interval-length premeasure defined on the algebra of finite unions of intervals [1], [2].

#The Lebesgue integral

A simple function is a finite combination s=∑i=1mai 1Ais=\sum_{i=1}^m a_i\,\ind_{A_i}s=∑i=1m​ai​1Ai​​ with ai≥0a_i\ge 0ai​≥0 and Ai∈FA_i\in\mathcal FAi​∈F, and its integral is ∫s dμ=∑i=1mai μ(Ai)\int s\,d\mu=\sum_{i=1}^m a_i\,\mu(A_i)∫sdμ=∑i=1m​ai​μ(Ai​), a value independent of the representation. For measurable f≥0f\ge 0f≥0 define

∫f dμ=sup⁡{∫s dμ:s simple, 0≤s≤f},(2)\int f\,d\mu=\sup\Big\{\textstyle\int s\,d\mu : s\text{ simple},\ 0\le s\le f\Big\}, \tag{2}∫fdμ=sup{∫sdμ:s simple, 0≤s≤f},(2)

and for general measurable fff, write f=f+−f−f=f^+-f^-f=f+−f− with f±=max⁡(±f,0)f^\pm=\max(\pm f,0)f±=max(±f,0) and set ∫f dμ=∫f+ dμ−∫f− dμ\int f\,d\mu=\int f^+\,d\mu-\int f^-\,d\mu∫fdμ=∫f+dμ−∫f−dμ whenever the difference is not ∞−∞\infty-\infty∞−∞. The function fff is integrable, f∈L1(μ)f\in L^1(\mu)f∈L1(μ), when ∫∣f∣ dμ<∞\int\abs{f}\,d\mu<\infty∫∣f∣dμ<∞.

#The convergence theorems

Theorem3

(Monotone convergence.) If fn≥0f_n\ge 0fn​≥0 are measurable with fn↑ff_n\uparrow ffn​↑f pointwise, then ∫fn dμ↑∫f dμ\int f_n\,d\mu\uparrow\int f\,d\mu∫fn​dμ↑∫fdμ.

Proof

The sequence ∫fn dμ\int f_n\,d\mu∫fn​dμ is nondecreasing and bounded above by ∫f dμ\int f\,d\mu∫fdμ from Equation (2), so it converges to some L≤∫f dμL\le\int f\,d\muL≤∫fdμ. Fix a simple sss with 0≤s≤f0\le s\le f0≤s≤f and a constant c∈(0,1)c\in(0,1)c∈(0,1), and set En={fn≥cs}E_n=\{f_n\ge cs\}En​={fn​≥cs}. Each En∈FE_n\in\mathcal FEn​∈F, the EnE_nEn​ increase, and ⋃nEn=Ω\bigcup_n E_n=\Omega⋃n​En​=Ω. Where s>0s>0s>0 one has f≥s>csf\ge s>csf≥s>cs and fn↑ff_n\uparrow ffn​↑f, so fn≥csf_n\ge csfn​≥cs eventually, while where s=0s=0s=0 one has cs=0≤fncs=0\le f_ncs=0≤fn​ for every nnn. Then

∫fn dμ≥∫Enfn dμ≥c∫Ens dμ,(3)\int f_n\,d\mu\ge\int_{E_n} f_n\,d\mu\ge c\int_{E_n} s\,d\mu, \tag{3}∫fn​dμ≥∫En​​fn​dμ≥c∫En​​sdμ,(3)

and continuity from below of the measure A↦∫As dμA\mapsto\int_A s\,d\muA↦∫A​sdμ, itself a consequence of Equation (1), gives ∫Ens dμ↑∫s dμ\int_{E_n} s\,d\mu\uparrow\int s\,d\mu∫En​​sdμ↑∫sdμ. Letting nnn grow yields L≥c∫s dμL\ge c\int s\,d\muL≥c∫sdμ; letting ccc approach 111 and taking the supremum over sss gives L≥∫f dμL\ge\int f\,d\muL≥∫fdμ. Both inequalities hold, so L=∫f dμL=\int f\,d\muL=∫fdμ.

Corollary4

(Fatou's lemma.) For measurable fn≥0f_n\ge 0fn​≥0, ∫lim inf⁡nfn dμ≤lim inf⁡n∫fn dμ\int\liminf_n f_n\,d\mu\le\liminf_n\int f_n\,d\mu∫liminfn​fn​dμ≤liminfn​∫fn​dμ.

Proof

Put gn=inf⁡k≥nfkg_n=\inf_{k\ge n} f_kgn​=infk≥n​fk​. Then gng_ngn​ is measurable, 0≤gn↑lim inf⁡nfn0\le g_n\uparrow\liminf_n f_n0≤gn​↑liminfn​fn​, and gn≤fkg_n\le f_kgn​≤fk​ for every k≥nk\ge nk≥n, so ∫gn dμ≤inf⁡k≥n∫fk dμ\int g_n\,d\mu\le\inf_{k\ge n}\int f_k\,d\mu∫gn​dμ≤infk≥n​∫fk​dμ. Applying Theorem 3 to gng_ngn​ on the left and passing to the limit on the right delivers the claim.

Theorem5

(Dominated convergence.) Suppose measurable fnf_nfn​ satisfy fn→ff_n\to ffn​→f pointwise and ∣fn∣≤g\abs{f_n}\le g∣fn​∣≤g for a fixed g∈L1(μ)g\in L^1(\mu)g∈L1(μ). Then f∈L1(μ)f\in L^1(\mu)f∈L1(μ) and ∫∣fn−f∣ dμ\int\abs{f_n-f}\,d\mu∫∣fn​−f∣dμ vanishes; in particular ∫fn dμ\int f_n\,d\mu∫fn​dμ converges to ∫f dμ\int f\,d\mu∫fdμ.

Proof

The bound ∣f∣≤g\abs{f}\le g∣f∣≤g passes to the limit, so f∈L1(μ)f\in L^1(\mu)f∈L1(μ). The functions 2g−∣fn−f∣2g-\abs{f_n-f}2g−∣fn​−f∣ are nonnegative, so Corollary 4 gives

∫2g dμ≤lim inf⁡n∫(2g−∣fn−f∣) dμ=∫2g dμ−lim sup⁡n∫∣fn−f∣ dμ.(4)\int 2g\,d\mu\le\liminf_n\int\big(2g-\abs{f_n-f}\big)\,d\mu=\int 2g\,d\mu-\limsup_n\int\abs{f_n-f}\,d\mu. \tag{4}∫2gdμ≤nliminf​∫(2g−∣fn​−f∣)dμ=∫2gdμ−nlimsup​∫∣fn​−f∣dμ.(4)

Since ∫2g dμ\int 2g\,d\mu∫2gdμ is finite it cancels, leaving lim sup⁡n∫∣fn−f∣ dμ≤0\limsup_n\int\abs{f_n-f}\,d\mu\le 0limsupn​∫∣fn​−f∣dμ≤0. The integrand is nonnegative, so the limit superior is exactly 000, and ∣∫fn dμ−∫f dμ∣≤∫∣fn−f∣ dμ\abs{\int f_n\,d\mu-\int f\,d\mu}\le\int\abs{f_n-f}\,d\mu​∫fn​dμ−∫fdμ​≤∫∣fn​−f∣dμ closes the argument.

#The LpL^pLp inequalities

For 1≤p<∞1\le p<\infty1≤p<∞ let ∥f∥p=(∫∣f∣p dμ)1/p\norm{f}_p=(\int\abs{f}^p\,d\mu)^{1/p}∥f∥p​=(∫∣f∣pdμ)1/p and let Lp(μ)L^p(\mu)Lp(μ) collect the measurable fff with ∥f∥p<∞\norm{f}_p<\infty∥f∥p​<∞, identified up to equality almost everywhere.

Proposition6

(Holder and Minkowski.) For conjugate exponents 1<p,q<∞1<p,q<\infty1<p,q<∞ with 1/p+1/q=11/p+1/q=11/p+1/q=1, ∫∣fg∣ dμ≤∥f∥p∥g∥q\int\abs{fg}\,d\mu\le\norm{f}_p\norm{g}_q∫∣fg∣dμ≤∥f∥p​∥g∥q​, and for 1≤p<∞1\le p<\infty1≤p<∞, ∥f+g∥p≤∥f∥p+∥g∥p\norm{f+g}_p\le\norm{f}_p+\norm{g}_p∥f+g∥p​≤∥f∥p​+∥g∥p​.

Proof

For Holder, if ∥f∥p=∞\norm f_p=\infty∥f∥p​=∞ or ∥g∥q=∞\norm g_q=\infty∥g∥q​=∞ the bound is trivial, and if ∥f∥p=0\norm f_p=0∥f∥p​=0 then f=0f=0f=0 almost everywhere so ∫∣fg∣=0\int\abs{fg}=0∫∣fg∣=0, likewise for ∥g∥q=0\norm g_q=0∥g∥q​=0. In the remaining case 0<∥f∥p,∥g∥q<∞0<\norm f_p,\norm g_q<\infty0<∥f∥p​,∥g∥q​<∞, Young's inequality ab≤ap/p+bq/qab\le a^p/p+b^q/qab≤ap/p+bq/q follows from concavity of the logarithm. Apply it to a=∣f∣/∥f∥pa=\abs f/\norm f_pa=∣f∣/∥f∥p​ and b=∣g∣/∥g∥qb=\abs g/\norm g_qb=∣g∣/∥g∥q​ and integrate, which gives ∫∣fg∣/(∥f∥p∥g∥q)≤1/p+1/q=1\int\abs{fg}/(\norm f_p\norm g_q)\le 1/p+1/q=1∫∣fg∣/(∥f∥p​∥g∥q​)≤1/p+1/q=1. For Minkowski the case p=1p=1p=1 is immediate from ∣f+g∣≤∣f∣+∣g∣\abs{f+g}\le\abs f+\abs g∣f+g∣≤∣f∣+∣g∣ integrated, so assume 1<p<∞1<p<\infty1<p<∞. If ∥f∥p=∞\norm f_p=\infty∥f∥p​=∞ or ∥g∥p=∞\norm g_p=\infty∥g∥p​=∞ the bound is trivial, and if ∥f+g∥p=0\norm{f+g}_p=0∥f+g∥p​=0 it is trivial. Otherwise convexity of t↦tpt\mapsto t^pt↦tp gives ∣f+g∣p≤2p−1(∣f∣p+∣g∣p)\abs{f+g}^p\le 2^{p-1}(\abs f^p+\abs g^p)∣f+g∣p≤2p−1(∣f∣p+∣g∣p), so ∥f+g∥p<∞\norm{f+g}_p<\infty∥f+g∥p​<∞ is finite and nonzero. Write ∣f+g∣p≤∣f+g∣p−1(∣f∣+∣g∣)\abs{f+g}^p\le\abs{f+g}^{p-1}(\abs f+\abs g)∣f+g∣p≤∣f+g∣p−1(∣f∣+∣g∣), integrate, and apply Holder to each term with exponent q=p/(p−1)q=p/(p-1)q=p/(p−1), using ∫(∣f+g∣p−1)q=∫∣f+g∣p<∞\int(\abs{f+g}^{p-1})^q=\int\abs{f+g}^p<\infty∫(∣f+g∣p−1)q=∫∣f+g∣p<∞, to obtain ∥f+g∥pp≤∥f+g∥pp−1(∥f∥p+∥g∥p)\norm{f+g}_p^p\le\norm{f+g}_p^{p-1}(\norm f_p+\norm g_p)∥f+g∥pp​≤∥f+g∥pp−1​(∥f∥p​+∥g∥p​); dividing by the finite nonzero ∥f+g∥pp−1\norm{f+g}_p^{p-1}∥f+g∥pp−1​ yields the triangle inequality.

Theorem7

(Riesz-Fischer.) Each Lp(μ)L^p(\mu)Lp(μ) is complete. Every Cauchy sequence converges in ∥⋅∥p\norm{\cdot}_p∥⋅∥p​ to an element of Lp(μ)L^p(\mu)Lp(μ) [1].

#A limit that is not an integral

Domination in Theorem 5 cannot be dropped. On (0,1)(0,1)(0,1) with Lebesgue measure the bumps fn=n 1(0,1/n)f_n=n\,\ind_{(0,1/n)}fn​=n1(0,1/n)​ converge pointwise to 000, yet each has integral 111; no integrable function dominates the family, and the limit of the integrals is not the integral of the limit.

import numpy as np


def escaping_mass_integral(n: int, grid: int = 1_000_000) -> float:
    """Midpoint estimate of the integral of n * indicator(0, 1/n) on (0, 1).

    Args:
        n: Height and inverse width of the bump.
        grid: Number of equal subintervals discretizing the unit interval.

    Returns:
        The approximate integral, equal to one for every n.
    """
    midpoints = (np.arange(grid) + 0.5) / grid
    heights = np.where(midpoints < 1.0 / n, float(n), 0.0)
    return float(heights.mean())


integrals = [escaping_mass_integral(n) for n in (1, 10, 100, 1_000)]
pointwise_limit = 0.0

The monotone convergence theorem is the one result that survives without a dominating function, and it is the engine from which the other two were derived.

[1]
G. B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed. Wiley, 1999.
[2]
P. Billingsley, Probability and Measure, 3rd ed. Wiley, 1995.

Part 2 of 6 in Measure and Integration

← previousSigma-Algebras and Measuresnext →The L-p Spaces

Explore connections

see in the atlas →

related

  • L-squared and Completeness
  • Product Measures and Fubini's Theorem
  • Uniform Integrability and the Vitali Theorem

referenced by (11)

  • Characteristic Functions
  • Inner Product Spaces
  • L-squared and Completeness
  • Metric and Normed Spaces
  • Probability Spaces and Random Variables
  • Product Measures and Fubini's Theorem
  • +5 more
cite
@misc{measures-and-integration,
  author = {Zac Kienzle},
  title  = {Measures and Integration},
  year   = {2026},
  month  = {06},
  url    = {https://zackienzle.com/blog/measures-and-integration}
}